The chariot was complex in its design and difficult to manufacture, but what a beautiful thing it was. No wonder it became the status symbol of the ancient world, the focus of military design and technology.
A battle chariot was a mobile firing platform. With it, firepower could be rushed wherever it was needed, at short notice.
The secondary purpose of a chariot was shock value - the iron-wheeled chariots of the Canaanites cut a terrible swathe through the ranks of their enemy.
To be of use, the chariot had to be quick and maneuverable as well as stable - though these things are contradictory. Speed and maneuverability require a small, light vehicle; but a firing platform has to be heavy if it is to be steady.
Achilles, with the body of Hector in tow, drives his chariot triumphantly around the walls of Troy
Usually there was space in the chariot for one weapon-carrying soldier and one driver. The driver was concerned solely with controlling the horses , leaving the soldier free for operational action.
For the designers of chariots there was a constant push-pull between speed and stability. This becomes evident when you examine the variety of chariots in the ancient world.
Egyptian chariot circa 15th century BC
The chariot was a complex, beautifully functional piece of design. It had body, wheels, axle, chariot pole, yoke, plus a range of fittings to hold weapons such as quivers, bow cases, sheaths and stands for axes and spears. Wood was the main element used, since it combined strength and lightness. There were special types of wood for each part of the chariot. Strips of leather and various metals were also used.
The chariot was complex in its design and difficult to manufacture. It could only be produced by countries with the right resources, and skilled craftsmen who knew what they were doing. When King Ahab of Israel said he had 900 chariots, he was describing not only his military might, but the extent of his country's resources.
For much of its early history Israel was unable to provide these resources. So it relied instead on outside manufacturers, or on surprise attacks and guerilla warfare which did not need chariots.
There were many different kinds of weapons in the lands of the Bible. For example, the Sumerians developed the use of chariots much earlier than Egypt. Battle chariots were used in Mesopotamia in the first half of the 3rd millennium; Egypt did not do so until 1,200 years later. Basically, there were two types of battle chariots:
Four-wheeled chariot drawn by four asses, from the Royal Standard of Ur
The chariot on the Standard of Ur is a 4-wheeled vehicle, carrying two soldiers, a warrior and his driver. At this early stage chariots were usually pulled by four animals, not necessarily horses; wild asses or onagers may have been used.
The fact that four animals were needed suggests that the vehicle was heavy, and that its traction system was primitive. This meant of course that vehicles could not turn quickly at speed, or they would roll over. The wheels of these vehicles were heavy, solid and without spokes. Their wooden wheels were liable to break and splinter when the driver tried to take a corner at speed. To strengthen the wheels, they were made of several boards joined together.
The front of the chariot had a high panel to protect the soldiers from frontal missiles. This must mean that direct frontal assault on the enemy was common. The fighting men in these chariots were armed with javelins, spears and an ax. The military use of bow and arrow was not yet common.
The function of the Sumerian chariot was to charge and terrify the enemy, then engage him with javelins and spears.
Chariots at this time (1570-1200BC) were light, two-wheeled vehicles, each wheel having four to six spokes. The body of the chariot had a leather-covered wooden frame, and was drawn by two horses. There were three main parts to this type of chariot: the wooden body, the wheels, and the pole and yoke.
Through most of the 15th century BC the Egyptian chariot was almost identical with the Canaanite, but when Thutmose IV became Pharaoh, the chariot became heavier, with eight-spoked wheels.
Chariot from the tomb of Tutankhamun
The tomb of Tutankhamun contained a dis-assembled chariot about 1.25 meters high and 1.02 meters wide. The width of the body was 4/7 of the length of the rod running down its center, which would have given it great stability when turning corners. After this period Egyptian chariots remained unchanged for some centuries. The only addition was a side-fitted quiver for javelins, in addition to the bow case and arrow quiver.
Egyptian and Canaanite chariots used two horses, but judging from the proportion of horses to chariots captured in battle, there were three horses to a team: two in harness and one in reserve. Though chariot horses were protected in battle by special armor, it was easy for the enemy to disable a horse, so a third horse was kept as emergency replacement.
Only the great armies were able to maintain chariot squadrons. So during the period of the Judges there is no mention of chariots in the tribal armies of Israel. In any event, the territory held by the Israelites at this point was hill country - better suited to cavalry than chariots.
The only mention of chariots is the great battle between Deborah and Barak, and the Canaanite general Sisera. Here, the 900 iron-wheeled chariots of the enemy were worse than useless in the quagmire at the bottom of Mount Tabor: 'And the Lord threw Sisera and all his chariots and all his army into a panic.' The Israelite guerilla fighters/army were able to slaughter their enemy and claim the day. (Judges 4 and 5).
Mount Tabor. The battle between the Israelite and Canaanite forces was fought on the plain at the bottom of the mountain. The flat land was transformed into heavy mud by the storm before the battle, and the enemy chariots were bogged down and useless.
When David set up his kingdom, chariots appeared. We know this because the prophet Samuel warned the people that a king ‘will take your sons, and appoint them for himself, for his chariots, and to be his horsemen; and some shall run before his chariots.’(I Samuel 8: 11). These were not battle chariots, of course. The bodyguard of runners was needed when the King drove his chariot through the alleys and narrow winding streets of the city. In fact, we do not know if David used chariots in battle.
The basic structure of a chariot
But if the chariot squadron in David's army was small, there is certainly no doubt that it reached quite formidable proportions in the army of Solomon. What those proportions were we do not know, since the Bible’s figures are not consistent:
It is of course impossible to determine which of the above figures is correct, but the fact remains that Solomon must have had a good many chariot horses. If the number of horses per chariot including the horse in reserve was three, then if we assume that the 4,000 figure was the true number of chariot horses in his possession, this would put the figure of his chariots at about 1,400 which would fit the 'fourteen hundred chariots' of the last Biblical quotation.
If, on the other hand, this 'thousand and four hundred chariots' refers not to chariots but to the total number of chariot horses—and the Bible frequently uses ‘rekheb’ to mean "chariot horse" - then the number of chariots in Solomon's army would be nearer to 500. This would be a sizable figure for the period, but quite realistic.
Assyrian chariot with archer, stone wall relief
After Solomon's death, his empire split in two: the northern kingdom of Israel, and the southern kingdom of Judah. The kingdom of Israel was by far the richer of the two, and much more able to support chariot cohorts in its army.
During this period chariots probably represented the principal strength of the Israelite army in open battle. In the Battle of Qarqar the army of King Ahab had 2,000 chariots, a figure which exceeded the combined total of chariots in all the other allied armies.
There are no images of the Israelite chariots, but Assyrian chariots of this period have two men in the crew, a driver and an archer.
King Ashurnasirpal leads a charge against the infantry and chariots of the enemy
The King's chariot, however, carried three - the King, his diver, and a third man who bore a shield for the protection of the King. This royal shield-bearer became, in time, a feature of the crews of all chariots.
The weapon of the chariot driver was a long spear. It was stuck next to his round shield which was kept at the rear of the chariot body. Two quivers were fitted to the side of the chariot, in the crossed position. One of them also held an axe. In combat the chariots flew standards with their special troop or squadron emblem for easy identification in the confusion of battle.
Tiglath-pileser III re-organised and re-equipped the Assyrian army and turned it into a powerful force. One of his innovations was to make the chariot a heavier vehicle. This had a purpose: in the Sargon chariots we find a crew of three. The third crewman holds two round shields, one to cover the driver and the other the archer. The number of horses was consequently increased to four to cope with the added weight.
The chariots of Sennacherib were of mixed types. He retained the model common in Sargon's army and reintroduced six-spoke wheels and the elliptical cross-piece between yoke and body. In the Sennacherib reliefs depicting scenes of the conquest of Lachish and the removal of the spoils, there is an illustration of a Judean battle chariot, belonging no doubt to the Governor of the city. This is the only illustration of its kind, enabling us to become familiar with the exact shape of the chariot in use in the kingdoms of Judah and Israel.
A characteristic chariot from the time of Ashurbanipal,
The chariot reached its most advanced and heaviest stage in the days of Ashurbanipal. Its wheels never had more than eight spokes, but their diameter was much greater and their rims were particularly thick. The crew had now grown to four—driver, archer, and two shield-bearers.This virtually converted the charioteers into a mounted infantry unit, and could at a stretch be seen as the proto-design of the modern tank.
Shalmaneser recorded that Ahab, King of Israel, had a chariot force of 2,000 at the Battle of Ramoth-Gilead. Despite this mighty force, he was not safe. A stray arrow pierced the gap between his scale armor and the brestplace, and he was mortally wounded. Dying, he asked his soldiers to prop him up on the base of his chariot, so that he might see the battle. At sunset he died, his blood washing the floor of the chariot - a good death for a warrior king like Ahab.
It was all downhill after that. The once-large chariot forces of the kings of Judah and of Israel in the 9th century BC became progressively smaller and poorer until, by the end of the century, the army numbered only "fifty horsemen, and ten chariots, and ten thousand footmen; for the king of Syria [Aram] had destroyed them, and had made them like the dust at threshing." (II Kings 13: 7)
The battle chariot's reign was over.
An Assyrian royal lion hunt, showing heavy-wheeled chariot
Study Resource for Archaeology